tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-55741777181394767582012-02-16T18:09:54.615-08:00AnDrEahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13519177388273521994noreply@blogger.comBlogger11100tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5574177718139476758.post-67523864967494509352008-10-23T17:08:00.000-07:002008-10-23T17:29:05.447-07:00<p align="justify"><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;color:#000000;">Honestly I don't use much technology in my classroom; just a few times I've brought something I consider interesting on a laptop to show them, but that's all.</span></p><p><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;color:#000000;">What do I think about a 2 month period class? well, we've managed a 4 month class with the kids program and it's good, because we have a continued process that in the case of children allows them to learn and understand the topics very well.</span></p><p align="justify"><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;color:#000000;">Also, I consider team-teaching groups great to create new projects, that norture each teacher's processes.</span></p><p><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;color:#000000;">Talking about the Dynamic Instructional Design model, I agree with the steps - it has all the components that make a class useful and I'm implementing that right away.</span></p><p><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;color:#000000;">After reading the documents I've noticed that never pay attention to technological supplies; for example I never ask myself: Which technologies are required for each strategy? (Part of the DID designer) or about the support technologies (Part of the action planner).</span></p><p><span style="font-family:trebuchet ms;color:#000000;">I think technology should be directly linked to our classes, actually I feel ashamed I don't use it.</span></p><div class="blogger-post-footer"><img width='1' height='1' src='https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/tracker/5574177718139476758-6752386496749450935?l=andrea354.blogspot.com' alt='' /></div>AnDrEahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13519177388273521994noreply@blogger.com0